“New Northern Transport Acceleration Council ‘will put rocket boosters under powerhouse plans’, says Grant Shapps”. Or Maybe Not?

Apparently an ‘establishment meeting’ of the Northern Transport Acceleration Council was held in September, which was attended by Councillors Blake and Hinchliffe for West Yorkshire.

In the interests of openness and accountability and all that sort of stuff, no published agenda or minutes available. The focus of this initial meeting was to establish the Council, and no substantive items were discussed.

So, no acceleration of either decision-making or implementation.

[Article from the Yorkshire Post, 24th July 2020, follows]

A new northern transport body will “put rocket boosters” under the Government’s plans to improve the region’s economy after years of frustratingly slow progress, Grant Shapps has claimed.

But the Transport Secretary was accused last night of “scapegoating” the body that already exists to provide a voice for the North for the slow progress being made on delivering major projects.

Mr Shapps told The Yorkshire Post said the Northern Transport Acceleration Council would provide “direct action” to get major schemes delivered and contrasted it with existing strategic body Transport for the North (TfN), which he described as being “by definition a talking shop”.

The creation of the new body, which meets for the first time in September and will be chaired by Mr Shapps or one of his team, is said to give northern leaders a “direct line” to Ministers to speed up the delivery of projects.

But it raises questions over the future of TfN, which the Government said would “transform transport across the North of England” when it was given statutory status in 2017.

Though its recommendations must be considered by government, it is reliant on the Department for Transport for funding and does not have the power to instruct other agencies on projects like the Transpennine Route Upgrade.

Asked what role TfN would play, Mr Shapps told The Yorkshire Post:

“With Transport for the North they have been quite good at convening people together. I have spoken to northern leaders previously who said ‘we didn’t really get together, we weren’t talking a lot before’.

“Transport for the North has helped that to happen but also as a mechanism for trying to prioritise, what should be done and when. So Transport for the North has been fulfilling that role, what I’m doing with the Northern Council today is, if you like, direct action.

“I think everybody is frustrated, we’ve got this great idea of the Northern Powerhouse, let’s make it actually meaningful, let’s have it mean something by which I mean, let’s get on and do things now, and Ministers are the right way to get that done.

“And I want to make sure that I’ve got a very open ongoing conversation with all the northern leaders and that’s what the Northern Transport Acceleration Council enables us to do.”

Earlier this month the Department for Transport told The Yorkshire Post that TfN was moving “much too slowly” in its plans for the flagship Northern Powerhouse Rail scheme.

Asked if he agreed, Mr Shapps said:

“I wouldn’t want to get into a blame game of who has done what and when. It is true that we all ought to be prioritising and getting on with it and I include government in that number.

“One of the features of course is that if you get 40 or 50 leaders together by its very nature, that is somewhere where you come together and you talk, it is by definition a talking shop when you do that.

“And that’s good, it serves a purpose. I think we also need to get on and deliver which is why Northern Council puts rocket boosters under the process.”

Public service union Unison yesterday wrote to TfN board members calling for them to raise concerns about the new organisation.

Kevan Nelson, Unison’s North West Regional Secretary, wrote:

“The Department for Transport already controls every aspect of funding, oversight and delivery of transport infrastructure.

“It is through this model that we have seen long delays to schemes like the Transpennine rail upgrade, an investment that has universal support in the North and that would unlock and enable growth and jobs across our cities, towns and villages.

“What the North needs isn’t another committee run and directed by the government, from Whitehall, re-announcing schemes that it has already spent a decade failing to deliver. It needs real investment and real devolved powers, to create and sustain jobs in the North.

“Our members within TfN are dedicated public servants, with a deep professional and personal commitment to improve public transport across the North. To be treated in such a manner where they are drip fed information via the national media and made to be scapegoats for systemic failings entirely beyond their control is inexcusable.”

Earlier this week, TfN chief executive Barry White hit back at suggestions his organisation was a “talking shop”.

He said:

“So let’s be clear, the Department for Transport already control every aspect of rail upgrades in the North: funding decisions, business case processes and oversight of Network Rail.

“The Government has direct control of every element that sets the speed of delivery.

“Transport for the North was established with limited powers, mainly to provide advice to Government and so, yes, we do talk.

“We talk with the North’s 20 political figureheads and business groups on their priorities and clear recommendations on the investment the North has long been promised and is well overdue.

“But we do not have the powers or devolved budget to instruct work or take the decisive action that we all collectively need. A situation we hope will soon change.”

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/transport/new-northern-transport-acceleration-council-will-put-rocket-boosters-under-powerhouse-plans-says-grant-shapps-2922087
Posted in TfN, Transpennine Route Upgrade | Tagged , | Leave a comment

WYCA Kirklees Consultation Transport Committee, 21 October 2020

Cllr Rob Walker, Chair of SMART, was able to ask questions at the WYCA Kirklees Consultation Transport Committee meeting held on 21st October.

The main question focused on the plans to mitigate difficulties for travellers from Slaithwaite & Marsden stations during Transpennine Upgrade work taking place elsewhere on the route. Unfortunately there are still no definite plans for even the first phase of this project. We were assured by the WYCA Transport Committee Chair and rail industry representatives that as the schedule of work emerges SMART will be consulted on the plans for passengers travelling longer distances to Leeds or Manchester.

We will work hard to keep passengers informed and to represent your interests.

The issue of serious accessibility concerns at both our stations was yet again highlighted. Again, there are still no definite plans on the table after years of discussions. At least we continue to maintain the profile of these long term concerns at regional level.

Posted in accessibility, Campaigning, Electrification, Marsden, METRO/WYCA, Slaithwaite, Transpennine Route Upgrade | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Meeting with Jason McCartney MP and Andrew Stephenson MP

SMART had an informal meeting with Jason McCartney, Colne Valley MP and Andrew Stephenson the rail minister at Marsden station on 24th July.

Andrew Stephenson has specific responsibility for the Transpennine Route Upgrade (TRU).

This was an opportunity to discuss the TRU and for us to raise concerns and questions we had as we need this investment to meet the needs of our communities.

The minister spoke about the announcement on July 23rd for £589 million to kick start the TRU (Transpennine Route Upgrade). He said that this was intended to be the first part of a much larger package, which was being developed with a view to obtaining treasury approval in December 2020, and which would be more ambitious than previous versions of TRU.  Elements that were now being considered included 3/4 track where practicable, full electrification, digital signalling and all stations being made accessible.

SMART emphasised the importance of all 4 of the stations in between Huddersfield and Stalybridge and our aspiration for 2 trains an hour throughout the day.

We emphasised that journey time improvements between Manchester and Leeds must not be at the expense of the smaller stations, and that places like Marsden and Slaithwaite also needed to see improvements as a result of TRU.

The group walked up to the road bridge to view the station and its lack of accessibility – steps, platforms etc.  A discussion took place on ideas about moving the station eastwards to the Old Goods Yard area so that the minister could see both why accessibility needed to be addressed and how it could be resolved.

Posted in accessibility, Campaigning, Marsden, Transpennine Route Upgrade | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“Electrification ‘desperately needed’ for Greenfield station”

[from the Oldham Chronicle, 14 September 2020]

Full electrification is ‘desperately needed’ at Greenfield station, Oldham East and Saddleworth MP Debbie Abrahams has said in a letter to the transport secretary, Grant Shapps.

The Government announced in July that it was merely ‘considering’ the full electrification of the line between Leeds and Manchester but, in her letter, Ms Abrahams is urging the transport secretary to commit to full electrification of the line. 

Detailing the points she raised in the letter, Ms Abrahams said:

“We were previously promised full electrification of the route, but this was pulled from the line as it passes between Stalybridge and Huddersfield, which of course, includes Greenfield.

“Full electrification is desperately needed for a number of reasons.

“Not only would this cut emissions and give passengers faster and more reliable journeys, but one of the major issues at Greenfield station is the lack of accessibility. 

“With nearly 400,000 journeys made in 2018/19, Greenfield station is one of the busiest in Greater Manchester without fully accessible platforms. 

“Currently those travelling towards Huddersfield have no step free access, and this is an issue for disabled residents, those with prams or anyone who is unable to use stairs.

“A requirement of the full electrification of the line would be a new footbridge across the tracks, and this new bridge must be accessible. 

“Despite the heavy footfall at Greenfield we have not been in consideration for the Government’s ‘access for all’ funding as Transport for Greater Manchester stated the previously promised electrification would mean we would be getting a new footbridge. 

“However, when this was withdrawn, the platforms’ accessibility issues at Greenfield were still not addressed. 

“Regarding the newly formed Transport Acceleration Council (TAC), I asked the transport secretary to provide more information about this new council.

“And I have urged him to commit to the full electrification of the Trans Pennine route ahead of the integrated rail plan.”

https://www.oldham-chronicle.co.uk/news-features/139/main-news/136534/electrification-%E2%80%98desperately-needed-for-greenfield-station

Posted in accessibility, Electrification, Transpennine Route Upgrade | Tagged , , | Leave a comment