Every Time You Think It Can’t Get Any Worse

We have now had six weeks of massive disruption.

Before the timetable change, Northern inflicted large scale disruption on passengers, with cancellations, bus replacements taking three times as long and even trains omitting our stops in order to make up time.

We thought TPE couldn’t possibly be any worse.

I’ll just repeat that to emphasise the point. We thought TPE couldn’t possibly be any worse.

Cancellations are now routine. Daily, trains for Manchester are terminated short at Stalybridge, dumping large numbers of passengers six miles short of their destination and left to hope that there will be onward travel. In the opposite direction, passengers from Manchester are unable to get to Stalybridge in time for onward travel to Marsden & Slaithwaite. Occasionally trains miss out or stops in order to make up time.

If it’s not cancelled, then it’s delayed. A fifteen minute delay is normal, a delay of only ten minutes now counts as a good news story.

Just when we had got used to the idea that cancellations and part cancellations would lead to two hour gaps in the service with occasional three hour gaps, TPE have managed (on 27th June) to extend that to a four hour gap between (approximately) 0915 and 1315 with no direct services between Slaithwaite and Manchester and the same in the return direction. And the same the following day, coming back from Manchester no direct trains between approximately 1830 and 2230. No explanation, no attempt at mitigation, passengers told to wait an hour for the next service even if it’s already known that that one’s cancelled, too.

Within that time period, TPE would have run 15 services between Huddersfield and Manchester, but weren’t willing to put a stop order on any one of those to enable passengers at Slaithwaite and Mossley to get to/from Manchester. Before the timetable change we were told stop orders could be made in those circumstances. We can think of no valid reason why they weren’t.

Other places on TPEs network are being affected, too. As described above, Hull to Manchester passengers get abandoned in Stalybridge. Scarborough’s hourly service often only makes it as far as Malton. Middlesbrough trains (also hourly) are often terminated short, too. Some of their trains to Newcastle get terminated short, but that’s of less significance because there are plenty of alternative trains between York and Newcastle.

The only bit they seem to be interested in is running fast trains at 15 minute intervals between Manchester, Leeds and York. If you’re not a passenger who wants to get from Manchester to Leeds or York in a hurry, then they’re just not interested in you.

It would be wrong to think TPE are failing, because that would be to imply that they are making an attempt to get things right.

So what’s the solution?

The fundamental problem is that to many trains are being squeezed on to a system which can’t cope, with pinch points at Manchester (several locations), between Stalybridge and Huddersfield, between Huddersfield and Leeds, and at Leeds station.

This is what happens when a silly obsession with running “six fast trains per hour” is pushed through without providing the necessary infrastructure. In the long term, capacity needs to be increased and the Transpennine Route Upgrade needs to deal with all the pinch points by reinstating all the cancelled or deferred schemes, additional track at key locations, full electrification, sufficient to cope with existing traffic and future growth. Over to you, Secretary of State.

In the short term, something needs to be done to make operations more resilient, with the focus firmly on minimising the scale of disruption to passengers. Remember them?

In order to do this, TPE needs to stop prioritising its long distance passengers over all the others. If, as with Northern, this requires an emergency timetable with some of the expresses removed (and the rolling stock released being used to lengthen the remaining expresses), then that is what should be done. Likewise, if putting stop orders in expresses is necessary in order to ensure passengers at places like Mossley and Slaithwaite retain a roughly hourly service throughout the day, then that too should be done.

TPE’s management also needs to apologise and acknowledge the extent of their failure, because until you acknowledge a problem you can’t begin to put it right. They also need to explain what they propose to do to put it right, and what they will do to regain the trust and confidence of passengers. Up to now they have been completely silent, maybe hoping that if they keep quiet none of the passengers will notice.

Posted in Slaithwaite, timetable changes, Transpennine Express | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Apparently It’s OK To Overcharge

Mark Wylo‎ to TransPennine Express Trains

20 June at 22:34 ·

Can you explain why the TPE website has issues with the season ticket fares to Slaithwaite? The only two options shown for a 7 day season ticket are £53 and £56.40. Yet the National Rail website shows a £50.80 direct fare, as well as noting that the £53 fare is via Hebden Bridge. How can TPE not have managed to get the fares right a month into the new timetable?

TransPennine Express Trains Hi Mark, where are you travelling from? ^LH

Mark Wylo Sorry, Manchester Piccadilly direct to Slaithwaite. It is a bit strange that there doesn’t seem to be the cheapest fare available on your own website don’t you think?

Mark Wylo I would appreciate a reply at some stage…

Mark Wylo Still waiting for a reply Transpennine!

TransPennine Express Trains Mark Wylo Hi Mark, the cheaper £50.80 is hot valid for travel via (changing trains or passing through) Huddersfield, so this would restrict your travel. The other two season tickets available match what Network Rail have on their site:

– £53.00 – Valid only for travel via (changing trains or passing through) Hebden Bridge)

– £56.40 – Any permitted route ^LH

Mark Wylo That does not explain why your website does not have the £50.80 fare which is the cheapest and the direct fare. My journey doesn’t take me through Huddersfield as Slaithwaite is on the Manchester side of Huddersfield. Surely it is up to me to decide how restricted I want my travel to be.

Mark Wylo According to Principle 3 of the Code of Practice on Retail information for Rail Tickets and Services it states that: Retailers should take steps to ensure that the information they provide is, to the best of their ability, accurate and truthful and that the way in which it is presented does not deceive passengers or lead the passenger to take a different understanding than that which is actually correct.

Mark Wylo I fully realise that you will be unable to answer every single question, but perhaps you might like to push this upstairs to management to get their view on whether the website is complying with the Code of Practice. I would like to hear their response.

 

Posted in fares, Slaithwaite, ticketing, Transpennine Express | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Cause For Celebration

Congratulations to TPE on managing a whole day on 20th June without any cancellations affecting Slaithwaite & Marsden. We think this may be first day this has happened since the new timetable came in.

Posted in Marsden, Slaithwaite, Transpennine Express | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A Month In, And It’s Still No Better

The timetable debacle (and just for the record it needs to be said that the service provided by TPE has been and still is every bit as bad as Northern) is a failure of management on a colossal scale. We have previously said that we can never track down anyone who admits responsibility for decisions that we as passengers don’t like. Whoever we talk to, it’s never them. It’s always an unspecified someone else. Yesterday the Transport Select Committee cross-examined the senior management of Arriva Northern and discovered the exact same thing.

The impact of the timetable changes, had TPE been able to actually operate something with at least a superficial relationship to the published timetable, was predictable. Skip-stopping, a reduction in peak frequencies to/from Manchester, reduction in peak capacity leading to overcrowding, extended journey times to the Manchester stations which most of the passengers on our line wanted to get to (for the record, that’s Victoria and Salford Central, not Piccadilly). All those we identified before the timetable change. There were supposed to be some benefits, including reduced journey times to Piccadilly and a more resilient timetable with one main operator (TPE) able to adapt when disruption occurred, by issuing stop orders when trains at our stations were cancelled.

We expected overcrowding on a large scale, but by and large that hasn’t happened. From day one, the service has been so unreliable that passengers have deserted the railway in large numbers. When the TPE franchise included something about promoting modal shift, we naively thought that meant getting people out of their cars and on to the trains, not the other way round.

The reduced journey times have been more than cancelled out by their habitual lateness. As for the resilience, almost daily trains have been terminated short at Stalybridge, leaving passengers stranded either waiting for the next train which might or might not turn up, or hoping to connect on to one of Northern’s trains and then finding them cancelled, too. No day is complete without at least one cancellation. It’s common for skip-stops to skip-stop the stations they are supposed to stop at, if that makes sense. Given the scale of the disruption, we would have expected a lot of stop orders, since it cannot be acceptable to leave two or even three hour gaps in the service. So far, over a month of chaos, there has been just one train subject to stop orders.

Today we have seen (before the evening peak, it may get worse):

  • the first morning train missing out Marsden, Greenfield and Mossley to make up time, even though it’s a strike day so the preceding Northern service was also cancelled.
  • an early afternoon train serving Slaithwaite and Mossley, and the return working, terminating/starting at Stalybridge.
  • an early afternoon train running Leeds-Huddersfield only (i.e. cancelled at Marsden, Greenfield, Stalybridge and Piccadilly).

It seems this is the new normal, and TPE have offered nothing by way of explanation or apology.

So what was until the timetable change a basic hourly service, half hourly at peak times, is now less frequent both peak and off-peak, and bears minimal resemblance to the published timetable. But at least the trains which turn up late or never are cleaner and more comfortable than the ones we endured before 20th May.

It’s not just Slaithwaite, Marsden, Greenfield and Mossley. Every day, some of TPEs trains for Scarborough and Middlesbrough get terminated short.

Yet no-one is taking responsibility for the situation. We don’t care about blame, but we do want someone to take responsibility.

We never did get to identify, still less talk to, whoever it was that thought skip-stopping between Stalybridge and Huddersfield was a good idea. Now we can’t seem to track down whoever it is that thinks that operational convenience is more important than mitigating the disruption to passengers.

As a fellow sufferer said earlier today,

“What’s the point of a train arriving at its destination vaguely on time if it’s failed to collect half of its passengers?”

There’s an excellent book by Alan Williams, published 1983 called “Not The Age Of The Train”. One of the chapters is entitled Passengers Are A Pest. Judging by the last month, nothing has changed.

Posted in Marsden, Slaithwaite, Transpennine Express | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment